
A New Party Enters the Al-Nasr and Al-Wahda Crisis
The management of Al-Akhdood Club has taken a decisive legal step by appointing the club's lawyer to officially communicate with the Saudi Sports Arbitration Center, according to what was published by the newspaper "Asharq Al-Awsat".
This step comes to inquire about the details of the expected decision in the case raised between Al-Wahda Club and Al-Nasr Club regarding Al-Nasr's delay in reaching the Al-Sharae Stadium in Mecca, which caused the match to be postponed for an hour.
The management of Al-Akhdood believes that this case has direct implications on the team's position in the Professional League table, as any decision that grants the match points to Al-Wahda could threaten the team's survival in the top league.
Al-Akhdood is seeking to know whether the Arbitration Center will issue an urgent decision in the case, which would help the management take the necessary legal steps to protect the club's sports interests.
It is worth noting that Al-Hilal Club had previously attempted to intervene in a similar case involving Al-Orouba and Al-Nasr, but its request was rejected due to the lack of a clear personal interest, raising questions about the Arbitration Center's stance this time.
This step comes to inquire about the details of the expected decision in the case raised between Al-Wahda Club and Al-Nasr Club regarding Al-Nasr's delay in reaching the Al-Sharae Stadium in Mecca, which caused the match to be postponed for an hour.
The management of Al-Akhdood believes that this case has direct implications on the team's position in the Professional League table, as any decision that grants the match points to Al-Wahda could threaten the team's survival in the top league.
Al-Akhdood is seeking to know whether the Arbitration Center will issue an urgent decision in the case, which would help the management take the necessary legal steps to protect the club's sports interests.
It is worth noting that Al-Hilal Club had previously attempted to intervene in a similar case involving Al-Orouba and Al-Nasr, but its request was rejected due to the lack of a clear personal interest, raising questions about the Arbitration Center's stance this time.