Behind the Scenes of the Hearing Session in the Case of Al-Nassr vs. Al-Urouba
The session did not witness the presence of player Al-Ruwaili, as he was not considered a direct party in the dispute, based on Article 26 of the procedural regulations of the Sports Arbitration Center.
During the session, the Saudi Football Federation reaffirmed the correctness of the player's registration procedures, emphasizing its legislative responsibility in this regard.
The federation clarified that the player's eligibility is measured by his discipline in training, official matches, and camps, which means there is no notable violation in Al-Ruwaili's case.
On the other hand, Al-Nassr was unable to present documents or evidence supporting its objection, either during the pleadings or in today's session, which weakened its legal position in the case.
Sports circles are currently awaiting the final decision from the Arbitration Center, which may have significant repercussions on the player's career and the fate of the disputing parties.
During the session, the Saudi Football Federation reaffirmed the correctness of the player's registration procedures, emphasizing its legislative responsibility in this regard.
The federation clarified that the player's eligibility is measured by his discipline in training, official matches, and camps, which means there is no notable violation in Al-Ruwaili's case.
On the other hand, Al-Nassr was unable to present documents or evidence supporting its objection, either during the pleadings or in today's session, which weakened its legal position in the case.
Sports circles are currently awaiting the final decision from the Arbitration Center, which may have significant repercussions on the player's career and the fate of the disputing parties.