The arbitration expert Fahd Al-Mirdasi explained that several clubs in the Roshn Saudi League were affected this season by decisions involving the denial of penalty kicks that, from his perspective, should have been awarded to them.

Al-Mirdasi pointed out that these incidents directly affected the outcomes of some matches, reigniting the debate over the accuracy of refereeing decisions and the assistive technologies used.

The arbitration expert explained that Al-Ahli was the most affected, having lost four penalty kicks that were not awarded in their favor during the past rounds of the competition.

Al Hilal came in second place on the list, having been denied two penalty kicks, amid widespread fan criticism demanding clarification of the details of those incidents.

The report also included the NEOM team, which faced a similar situation after the team recorded two instances where penalty kicks were not awarded, although they were believed to be deserved.

Al-Nassr, Al-Shabab, and Al-Ettifaq each suffered from one unawarded penalty kick, completing the list of clubs most affected by refereeing decisions this season.